Comparatives And Ellipsis

نویسنده

  • Stephen G. Pulman
چکیده

This paper analyses the syntax and semantics of English comparatives, and some types of ellipsis. It improves on other recent analyses in the computational linguistics literature in three respects: (i) it uses no treeor logical-form rewriting devices in building meaning representations (ii) this results in a fully reversible linguistic description, equally suited for analysis or generation (iii) the analysis extends to types of elliptical comparative not elsewhere treated. INTRODUCTION Many treatments of the English comparative construction have been advanced recently in the computational linguistics literature (e.g. Rayner and Banks, 1989; Ballard, 1988). This interest reflects the importance of the construction for many natural language applications, especially those concerning access to databases, where it is natural to require information about quantitative differences and limits which are most naturally expressed in terms of comparatives and superlatives. However, all of these analyses have their defects (as no doubt does this one). The most pervasive of these defects is one of principle: they all place a high reliance on non-compositional methods (tree or formula rewriting) for assembling the logical forms of comparatives even in cases that might be thought to be straightforwardly compositional. These devices mean that the grammatical descriptions involved lack, to varying extents, the important property of reversibility: they can only be used to analyse, not to generate, expressions of comparison. This is a serious restriction on the practical usefulness of such analyses. The analysis presented here of the syntax and compositional semantics of the main instances of the English comparative and superlative is intended to provide a fairly theory-neutral ‘off the shelf’ treatment which can be translated into a range of current grammatical theories. The main theoretical claim is that by factoring out the compositional properties of the construction from the various types of ellipsis also involved, a cleaner treatment can be arrived at which does not need any machinery specific to this construction. A semantics in terms of generalised quantifiers is proposed.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Winfried Lechner Reduced and Phrasal Comparatives

In this paper, I defend two hypotheses as to the derivation of phonologically reduced comparative constructions. On the one hand, I present evidence which supports an ellipsis analysis of phrasal comparatives over base-generation approaches. On the other hand, it is argued that the restrictions on deletion in comparatives are exhaustively determined by the principles governing Gapping, Right No...

متن کامل

Lechner Reduced And

In this paper, I defend two hypotheses as to the derivation of phonologically reduced comparative constructions. On the one hand, I present evidence which supports an ellipsis analysis of phrasal comparatives over base-generation approaches. On the other hand, it is argued that the restrictions on deletion in comparatives are exhaustively determined by the principles governing Gapping, Right No...

متن کامل

Comparative Ellipsis and Variable Binding

It is hard to find a class of natural language phenomena which exhibits more complex interactions between syntax and semantics than comparative constructions. Comparatives come with phrasal or clausal complements. In this paper, we focus on phrasal comparatives, which on first inspection look simpler than the clausal ones, but in fact add a degree of complexity. We will consider predicative com...

متن کامل

Parsing and Interpreting Comparatives

1. INTRODUCTION We describe a fairly comprehensive handling of the syntax and semantics of comparative constructions. The analysis is largely based on the theory developed by Pinkham, but we advance arguments to support a different handling of phrasal comparatives-in particular, we use direct interpretation instead of C-ellipsis. We .explain the reasons for dividing comparative sentences into d...

متن کامل

Degree comparison without degree abstraction1

This paper argues that Mandarin Chinese fills a gap in the typology of comparative constructions in natural language. Beck et al. (2004) proposes that languages may vary in whether or not they allow for degree abstraction, and Kennedy (2007) proposes a distinction between comparative constructions with degree-denoting standards and individual-denoting standards. Based on these parameters, we ex...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1991